No |
Performance
Indicator |
Themes |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| 1 |
Quality
of the trans-
national element |
| 1.1 |
Link between the aims
of the event and the overarching aims of the transnational project/funding
programme |
v
clear
evidence in the event programme of synergy with the overarching transnational
project and the relevant funding programme |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 1.2 |
Development of positive
attitudes towards Europe |
v
opportunities
for the development of positive attitudes towards Europe and transnational
activities |
|
|
|
|
| v
extent
and quality of the intercultural dimension |
|
|
|
|
| v
extent
of the opportunity for participants to share relevant information about
their own countries |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 1.3 |
Promotion of other
languages |
v
extent
and quality of opportunities for the use of various languages, both
by trainers and by participants |
|
|
|
|
| v
evidence
of strategies for overcoming language difficulties |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 1.4 |
Representation of a
variety of countries |
v
extent
to which a reasonable representation of participants from various countries
has been achieved |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 2 |
Structure,
content and
delivery of the event |
| 2.1 |
Organisation of the
transnational event |
v
evidence
of clear planning |
|
|
|
|
| v
realistic
timescales |
|
|
|
|
| v
appropriate
selection of delegates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 2.2 |
Effectiveness of content
and appropriate range and balance of activities |
v
appropriate
content, clearly related to the aims/objectives of the event |
|
|
|
|
| v
relevant
mixture of activities: e.g. ice-breaking activities, information-giving
sessions, active participation in workshops by participants etc. |
|
|
|
|
| v
appropriateness
of social programme |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 2.3 |
Effectiveness of the
delivery by trainers/workshop leaders etc. |
v
trainers/leaders
have the appropriate subject competence and knowledge |
|
|
|
|
| v
trainers/leaders
are good communicators, with the necessary language skills |
|
|
|
|
| v
trainers/leaders
have the appropriate didactic experience for delivering professional
development |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 2.4 |
Effectiveness of shared
ownership of the event |
v
evidence
that the needs and expectations of participants have been taken into
account |
|
|
|
|
| v
evidence
that participants have the opportunity to contribute their own expertise |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 2.5 |
Effectiveness of the
process of monitoring and evaluation |
v
quality
of the mechanism for evaluation, both short-term and long-term if appropriate,
including post-event follow-up |
|
|
|
|
| v
evidence
of on-going assistance to participants, if appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 3
|
Materials,
resources,
equipment |
| 3.1 |
Provision and suitability
of materials, resources and equipment |
v
evidence
of appropriate prior information being issued to participants |
|
|
|
|
| v
relevance
and quality of materials issued during the event |
|
|
|
|
| v
sufficiency,
range and suitability of other resources, including, where appropriate,
ICT |
|
|
|
|
| v
provision
of support and assistance for technology users |
|
|
|
|
| v
extent
to which technology and other resources are used effectively and innovatively |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
| 4 |
Quality
of the domestic
arrangements |
| 4.1 |
Quality and appropriateness
of the domestic arrangements and the comfort factor |
v
attention
to practical details and catering arrangements |
|
|
|
|
| v
suitability
of working venue |
|
|
|
|
| v
quality
of overnight accommodation where appropriate |
|
|
|
|
| v
evidence
of any special requirements of participants being taken account of |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
